Recovering Critical Sense Through the Completeness of Cerebral Movement EEG ERP MMN  in Jiwasa Mode

Today we’re not going to talk about someone. We’re going to speak from the inside—as if our voice becomes a shared pause, an inclusive we. That’s Jiwasa: a “we” that doesn’t expel, doesn’t humiliate, doesn’t demand dogma as the price of belonging. And precisely because of that, we can touch a delicate truth without turning it into a fight:

There is a kind of belonging that regulates us… and there is a kind of belonging that hijacks us.

The difference is simple and deep. When belonging is healthy, it gives us ground to think better. When belonging becomes hijack, it charges an invisible fee: we start to detect errors, but we lose the courage, time, or safety to correct them. Critical sense doesn’t disappear because of ignorance; it disappears because of incomplete movement.

1) What we mean by “loss of critical sense”

In body-and-brain language, we can imagine a fast internal cycle:

1. Deviation detection (MMN): something doesn’t fit. A subtle internal alarm happens before we even “think.” In research, Mismatch Negativity (MMN) is often discussed as an automatic signal of deviance/prediction error.

2. Updating and resource allocation (P300): noticing isn’t enough. We need to give weight to the signal and update our internal model of what’s happening. The P300 family is a classic marker of this “update” stage—when attention and working resources are committed to revise what we’re tracking.

3. Meaning integration and reanalysis (N400/P600): when the problem is semantic (“this doesn’t make sense”), markers like N400 and, during reinterpretation, P600 come in. A friendly everyday example is humor: jokes force us to revise an interpretation so a new meaning can click.

Now we bring it together: losing critical sense isn’t “not seeing.” It’s seeing and not completing. We detect something off, but we don’t update. We feel the mismatch, but we don’t reorganize. We perceive, but we don’t move.

2) Why “we” can help—and why “we” can also trap

Groups serve something vital: they regulate anxiety, give belonging, provide rhythm, offer protection. But our nervous system also learns a quiet social rule: correcting can cost our place. And once we learn that, an adaptation begins:

• we relativize too quickly,

• we laugh at what hurts,

• we call “drama” what was a signal,

• we call “faith” what was fear,

• we call “respect” what was internal censorship.

None of this requires ideology. It only requires an environment where questioning becomes dangerous. The result is neuro-behavioral: we get good at not completing the correction cycle.

This is where Jiwasa becomes an antidote: a we where questions are welcome, where belonging doesn’t require anesthesia.

3) Simple example: the TV news with no pause (a hijacked talk-turn)

Now we use a daily-life example—without paranoia and without a conspiracy story: TV news rarely gives us pause. One segment pushes into the next, the voice rhythm keeps moving, silence is minimized, and there’s hardly any space for the mind to “settle.”

Even without assuming bad intent, we can recognize a functional logic: continuous flow tends to hold attention. But there’s a cognitive side effect. Without micro-pauses, we lose space to:

• let the MMN become a conscious “something is off,”

• give time for P300 to update our internal model,

• allow “this doesn’t add up” to become meaning-level integration (N400/P600).

There’s also a human detail: natural conversation is already fast. Turn-taking happens with very short gaps because we anticipate the next turn. But broadcast media gives us a “closed turn”: we can’t interrupt, can’t ask for an example, can’t say “go back.” It’s turn-taking without reciprocity. The result is that our metacognition becomes a spectator.

So when we ask, “Why do we feel overwhelmed and under-thinking after certain information streams?” one answer is: the stream was engineered to keep moving—and our correction cycle needs space to complete.

4) Simple example: speeding videos up (1.5x, 2x) and losing cognitive “room”

Another modern habit is accelerating everything. Sometimes it helps, sometimes it costs. When we increase playback speed, we can keep up with the surface content, but we often reduce the internal room for:

• noticing mismatch clearly,

• updating the model without overload,

• integrating meaning without rushing.

In plain language: we can follow, but we can’t hear ourselves thinking. And without that inner hearing, the correction cycle shrinks.

This matters because critical sense isn’t only “having opinions.” It’s having processing room—room for detection, updating, and meaning repair.

5) Jokes as a gentle training ground for critical sense (no fights, just laughter)

Here we use humor as a Jiwasa tool, because humor is a safe laboratory:

• we build an expectation,

• something breaks the expectation,

• we accept: “our first reading was wrong,”

• we reinterpret,

• the body rewards us with laughter.

That is critical sense without aggression. It’s interpretive flexibility with pleasure, not with attack.

And this is powerful for our theme: we can show, live, that correction is not humiliation. Correction can be relief. Correction can be liberation.

6) Three micro-rituals in Jiwasa to restore completeness

Now we turn everything into collective practice:

Ritual 1 — the 2-second pause (the right to silence)
After a strong sentence (on the news, in a video, in a group), we take two seconds and ask internally:

• “What did we just assume is true?”

• “What evidence would change our mind?”
  This pause returns the space where updating becomes possible—where the P300-like “model refresh” can happen without overload.

Ritual 2 — the mandatory example (one that supports, one that challenges)
If a statement can’t generate examples, it becomes a mantra. So we require:

• one simple example that supports it,

• one simple example that contradicts it.
  This forces completeness: detection → update → meaning integration.

Ritual 3 — good-faith humor against rigidity
We try to play gently with our own certainties (not to mock anyone). If nothing can be played with—ever—sometimes that isn’t depth; it’s rigidity. And rigidity is one of the most common signs of hijack: the body locked into a single interpretation.

Closing

The proposal today, in Jiwasa mode, is simple: belong without becoming a soldier. A we that can hold questions, revision, correction, and pause. A we where we can say “I don’t understand” without losing dignity.

Because when belonging is healthy, it doesn’t steal movement—it returns movement.

And that’s what we mean by recovering critical sense: recovering the completeness of cerebral movement—detecting the mismatch (MMN), updating attention and the model (P300), and reorganizing meaning (N400/P600). No dogma. With ground. With we.

References (for grounding; mostly post-2023 as requested)

1. Huang et al. (2024). Work on MMN subcomponent architecture (eNeuro/PMC).

2. Yu et al. (2024). Meta-analysis on ERP components and cognitive load in multimedia learning (Frontiers in Psychology).

3. Meyer (2023). Work on timing and turn-taking in conversation (Journal of Cognition).

4. Murphy et al. (2023). Study on playback speed, learning, and mind-wandering (PMC).

5. Huang et al. (2025). Meta-analysis on accelerated video learning and cognitive/learning effects (PMC).

6. Keim et al. (2025). EEG study on pun-based jokes with N400/P600 effects (PDF).

7. Rodero & Cores-Sarría (psychophysiological study) on prosody/style in news presentation (used to support the “no-pause news” example).

Recuperando el Sentido Crítico Mediante la Completud del Movimiento Cerebral EEG ERP MMN en Modo Jiwasa

Recovering Critical Sense Through the Completeness of Cerebral Movement EEG ERP MMN in Jiwasa Mode

Recuperando o Senso Crítico na Completude do Movimento Cerebral EEG ERP MMN em Modo Jiwasa

Espiritualidad que Regula el Cuerpo — Pertenecer Sin Volverse Soldado

Spirituality that Regulates the Body — Belonging Without Becoming a Soldier

La Atención No es un Canal — Es un Estado del Cuerpo en lo Colectivo

Attention Is Not a Channel — It’s a Bodily State in the Collective

Política que Regula el Cuerpo — Pertenencia Antes del Dogma

Politics that Regulates the Body — Belonging Before Dogma

Carnaval como Tecnología de Regulación Colectiva

Carnival as a Technology of Collective Regulation

America Latina on its feet: when the party becomes collective consciousness

América Latina en pie: cuando la fiesta se vuelve conciencia colectiva

América Latina em Pé: quando a festa vira consciência coletiva

Espiritualidade que Regula o Corpo - Pertencer Sem Virar Soldado

Atenção Não é Canal - É Estado do Corpo no Coletivo

Política que Regula o Corpo - Pertencimento Antes do Dogma

Carnaval é Tecnologia de Regulação Coletiva

Bad Bunny Super Bowl Halftime Show 2026

#Decolonial
#Neuroscience
#EEGResearch
#ERPComponents
#MMN
#P300
#N400
#P600
#SemanticProcessing
#LanguageERP
#CriticalThinkingBrain
#JiwasaNeural
#BrainLatam
#ConcienciaLatina
#BadBunnySuperBowl
#BadBunnyHalftimeShow
#SuperBowl2026
#CBDCdeVarejo
#PIX
#DREX
#DrexCidadão